Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorJiménez Navia, Breyner
dc.coverage.spatialEscuela Superior de Guerra "Rafael Reyes Prieto" Bogotá 2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-07T00:30:16Z
dc.date.available2024-12-07T00:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-25
dc.date.submitted2024-11-06
dc.identifier.citationAPAes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14205/11343
dc.description.abstractEl Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) de la Armada Nacional de Colombia enfrenta el desafío de garantizar su sostenibilidad a largo plazo y fortalecer su capacidad para desarrollar y transferir tecnologías innovadoras al sector defensa. Este estudio aborda la importancia de implementar un modelo de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas como estrategia de sostenimiento para el CEDNAV. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre modelos de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas aplicados en centros de desarrollo tecnológico a nivel internacional. Además, se examinaron las principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de estos modelos en el sector defensa, considerando la experiencia de varios países. Como resultados se reveló una amplia gama de modelos de licenciamiento, incluyendo enfoques como la innovación abierta, el licenciamiento estratégico, la colaboración y el intercambio de conocimientos, el licenciamiento basado en el desempeño y el licenciamiento socialmente responsable. Se identificaron estrategias clave para el éxito del licenciamiento, como el desarrollo de capacidades internas sólidas, la gestión proactiva de la propiedad intelectual y el fomento de colaboraciones estratégicas. Además, se destacaron las principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de estos modelos en el sector defensa, resaltando la importancia de un marco institucional sólido, la colaboración entre los actores del ecosistema de innovación y políticas públicas adecuadas.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe Naval Technological Development Centre (CEDNAV) of the National Navy of Colombia faces the challenge of ensuring its long-term sustainability and strengthening its capacity to develop and transfer innovative technologies to the defence sector. This study addresses the importance of implementing a technological innovation licensing model as a sustainability strategy for CEDNAV. A systematic review of the literature on technological innovation licensing models applied in technological development centres at the international level was conducted. Furthermore, the main barriers and opportunities in the implementation of these models in the defence sector were examined, considering the experience of various countries. The results revealed a wide range of licensing models, including approaches such as open innovation, strategic licensing, collaboration and knowledge exchange, performance-based licensing, and socially responsible licensing. Key strategies for successful licensing were identified, such as the development of strong internal capabilities, proactive intellectual property management, and the promotion of strategic collaborations. In addition, the main barriers and opportunities in the implementation of these models in the defence sector were highlighted, emphasising the importance of a solid institutional framework, collaboration among actors within the innovation ecosystem, and appropriate public policies.es_ES
dc.description.tableofcontentsResumen – Abstract – Introducción -- La importancia de las teorías de innovación y comercialización para el licenciamiento de tecnologías en el CEDNAV -- Modelos de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas aplicados en centros de desarrollo tecnológico -- Aplicabilidad en el contexto del Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) -- Principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de modelos de licenciamiento de tecnologías en el sector defensa -- Propuesta de marco de sostenimiento para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV), basado en el licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas -- Adopción de un enfoque de innovación abierta -- Implementación de un modelo de licenciamiento estratégico -- Incorporación en redes y ecosistemas de innovación -- Desarrollo de capacidades internas -- Gestión de la propiedad intelectual -- Fomento de colaboraciones y asociaciones estratégicas -- Adaptabilidad y flexibilidad en el enfoque de licenciamiento – Conclusiones -- Referencias Bibliográficases_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.titlePropuesta de sostenimiento para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) a través del licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicases_ES
dc.title.alternativeA proposal for sustaining the Centre for the Development of Naval Technology (CEDNAV) through the licensing of technological innovationses_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. MIT press.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBerman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton University Press.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCaviggioli, F., & Ughetto, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.xes_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationConti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2019). Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organization Science, 30(1), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1243es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.562es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGambardella, A., Giuri, P., & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8), 1163-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for "ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research policy, 32(2), 333-350.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGoldstein, A. (2002). The political economy of high-tech industries in developing countries: aerospace in Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 521-538.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGonzalez-Perez, M. A., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). South-South cooperation and technology transfer for sustainable development: Lessons from Latin America. Journal of International Development, 32(4), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3474es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGranstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGranstrand, O. (2004). The economics and management of technology trade: Towards a prolicensing era?. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 209-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.003953es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGranstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem. California Management Review, 55(4), 184-210. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375- 423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHartley, K. (2011). The economics of defence policy: a new perspective. Routledge.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects. Journal of Management, 31(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272291es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKline, D. (2003). Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 89-93.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLaursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLazaric, N., Mérindol, V., & Rochhia, S. (2011). Changes in the French defence innovation system: New roles and capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence. Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 509-530.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMani, S. (2011). Promoting knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in India. In Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development (pp. 168-188). Oxford University Press.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMazzola, E., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2012). The effect of inbound, outbound and coupled innovation on performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(06), 1240008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612400087es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMimura, C. (2007). Technology licensing for the benefit of the developing world: UC Berkeley's socially responsible licensing program. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781698310es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1256). North-Holland.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOrtega, H., & Rivera, J. P. (2019). Innovation and technology transfer in Latin America: The challenges of the regional integration. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.10.002es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPérez, C., & Truffer, I. (2010). Biotecnología para el desarrollo en América Latina: Oportunidades y desafíos. In Innovación y Desarrollo: Desafíos para Chile y América Latina. Universidad de Chile.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPerkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259- 280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.xes_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage–How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.xes_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRoijakkers, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy, 35(3), 431- 446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.006es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSpithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSempere, C. M. (2018). Collaborative innovation and intellectual property management: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(1-2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2018.090403es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTeece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTeece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367- 1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUrraca-Ruiz, A., & Santos, G. A. (2013). The role of public research institutes in the Brazilian innovation system. In Innovative firms in emerging market countries (pp. 71- 102). Oxford University Press.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. New frontiers in open innovation, 281.es_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6- 7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001es_ES
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_ES
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_ES
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccees_ES
dc.audiencePúblico generales_ES
dc.contributor.tutorBustos Parra, Linda Diana
dc.identifier.instnameEscuela Superior de Guerra "General Rafael Reyes Prieto"es_ES
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio ESDEGes_ES
dc.publisher.disciplineEspecialización en Seguridad y Defensa Nacionaleses_ES
dc.publisher.placeBogotáes_ES
dc.relation.citationEdition25 hojases_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.ccCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.subject.keywordsSostenimientoes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsLicenciamientoes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsInnovación Tecnológicaes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsPropiedad Intelectuales_ES
dc.subject.keywordsComercialización De Tecnologíaes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsCdtes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsSustainabilityes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsLicensinges_ES
dc.subject.keywordsTechnological Innovationes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsIntellectual Propertyes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsTechnology Commercializationes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsTdces_ES
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES
dc.type.spaArtículoes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/