Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Propuesta de sostenimiento para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) a través del licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas
dc.contributor.author | Jiménez Navia, Breyner | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Escuela Superior de Guerra "Rafael Reyes Prieto" Bogotá 2023 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-07T00:30:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-07T00:30:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-25 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | APA | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14205/11343 | |
dc.description.abstract | El Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) de la Armada Nacional de Colombia enfrenta el desafío de garantizar su sostenibilidad a largo plazo y fortalecer su capacidad para desarrollar y transferir tecnologías innovadoras al sector defensa. Este estudio aborda la importancia de implementar un modelo de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas como estrategia de sostenimiento para el CEDNAV. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre modelos de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas aplicados en centros de desarrollo tecnológico a nivel internacional. Además, se examinaron las principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de estos modelos en el sector defensa, considerando la experiencia de varios países. Como resultados se reveló una amplia gama de modelos de licenciamiento, incluyendo enfoques como la innovación abierta, el licenciamiento estratégico, la colaboración y el intercambio de conocimientos, el licenciamiento basado en el desempeño y el licenciamiento socialmente responsable. Se identificaron estrategias clave para el éxito del licenciamiento, como el desarrollo de capacidades internas sólidas, la gestión proactiva de la propiedad intelectual y el fomento de colaboraciones estratégicas. Además, se destacaron las principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de estos modelos en el sector defensa, resaltando la importancia de un marco institucional sólido, la colaboración entre los actores del ecosistema de innovación y políticas públicas adecuadas. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | The Naval Technological Development Centre (CEDNAV) of the National Navy of Colombia faces the challenge of ensuring its long-term sustainability and strengthening its capacity to develop and transfer innovative technologies to the defence sector. This study addresses the importance of implementing a technological innovation licensing model as a sustainability strategy for CEDNAV. A systematic review of the literature on technological innovation licensing models applied in technological development centres at the international level was conducted. Furthermore, the main barriers and opportunities in the implementation of these models in the defence sector were examined, considering the experience of various countries. The results revealed a wide range of licensing models, including approaches such as open innovation, strategic licensing, collaboration and knowledge exchange, performance-based licensing, and socially responsible licensing. Key strategies for successful licensing were identified, such as the development of strong internal capabilities, proactive intellectual property management, and the promotion of strategic collaborations. In addition, the main barriers and opportunities in the implementation of these models in the defence sector were highlighted, emphasising the importance of a solid institutional framework, collaboration among actors within the innovation ecosystem, and appropriate public policies. | es_ES |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Resumen – Abstract – Introducción -- La importancia de las teorías de innovación y comercialización para el licenciamiento de tecnologías en el CEDNAV -- Modelos de licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas aplicados en centros de desarrollo tecnológico -- Aplicabilidad en el contexto del Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) -- Principales barreras y oportunidades en la implementación de modelos de licenciamiento de tecnologías en el sector defensa -- Propuesta de marco de sostenimiento para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV), basado en el licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas -- Adopción de un enfoque de innovación abierta -- Implementación de un modelo de licenciamiento estratégico -- Incorporación en redes y ecosistemas de innovación -- Desarrollo de capacidades internas -- Gestión de la propiedad intelectual -- Fomento de colaboraciones y asociaciones estratégicas -- Adaptabilidad y flexibilidad en el enfoque de licenciamiento – Conclusiones -- Referencias Bibliográficas | es_ES |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.title | Propuesta de sostenimiento para el Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico Naval (CEDNAV) a través del licenciamiento de innovaciones tecnológicas | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | A proposal for sustaining the Centre for the Development of Naval Technology (CEDNAV) through the licensing of technological innovations | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. MIT press. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton University Press. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99) | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Caviggioli, F., & Ughetto, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Novelli, E. (2019). Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organization Science, 30(1), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1243 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Fosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.562 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8), 1163-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for "ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research policy, 32(2), 333-350. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Goldstein, A. (2002). The political economy of high-tech industries in developing countries: aerospace in Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), 521-538. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). South-South cooperation and technology transfer for sustainable development: Lessons from Latin America. Journal of International Development, 32(4), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3474 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Granstrand, O. (2004). The economics and management of technology trade: Towards a prolicensing era?. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 209-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.003953 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem. California Management Review, 55(4), 184-210. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375- 423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hartley, K. (2011). The economics of defence policy: a new perspective. Routledge. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects. Journal of Management, 31(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272291 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Kline, D. (2003). Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 89-93. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Lazaric, N., Mérindol, V., & Rochhia, S. (2011). Changes in the French defence innovation system: New roles and capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence. Industry and Innovation, 18(5), 509-530. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Mani, S. (2011). Promoting knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in India. In Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development (pp. 168-188). Oxford University Press. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Mazzola, E., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2012). The effect of inbound, outbound and coupled innovation on performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(06), 1240008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612400087 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Mimura, C. (2007). Technology licensing for the benefit of the developing world: UC Berkeley's socially responsible licensing program. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781698310 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Mowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1256). North-Holland. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Ortega, H., & Rivera, J. P. (2019). Innovation and technology transfer in Latin America: The challenges of the regional integration. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.10.002 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Pérez, C., & Truffer, I. (2010). Biotecnología para el desarrollo en América Latina: Oportunidades y desafíos. In Innovación y Desarrollo: Desafíos para Chile y América Latina. Universidad de Chile. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259- 280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage–How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Roijakkers, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy, 35(3), 431- 446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.006 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Sempere, C. M. (2018). Collaborative innovation and intellectual property management: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(1-2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2018.090403 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367- 1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015 | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Urraca-Ruiz, A., & Santos, G. A. (2013). The role of public research institutes in the Brazilian innovation system. In Innovative firms in emerging market countries (pp. 71- 102). Oxford University Press. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., & West, J. (2014). Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. New frontiers in open innovation, 281. | es_ES |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6- 7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 | es_ES |
datacite.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | es_ES |
oaire.resourcetype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | es_ES |
oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce | es_ES |
dc.audience | Público general | es_ES |
dc.contributor.tutor | Bustos Parra, Linda Diana | |
dc.identifier.instname | Escuela Superior de Guerra "General Rafael Reyes Prieto" | es_ES |
dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio ESDEG | es_ES |
dc.publisher.discipline | Especialización en Seguridad y Defensa Nacionales | es_ES |
dc.publisher.place | Bogotá | es_ES |
dc.relation.citationEdition | 25 hojas | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.cc | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.subject.keywords | Sostenimiento | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Licenciamiento | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Innovación Tecnológica | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Propiedad Intelectual | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Comercialización De Tecnología | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Cdt | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Sustainability | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Licensing | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Technological Innovation | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Intellectual Property | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Technology Commercialization | es_ES |
dc.subject.keywords | Tdc | es_ES |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es_ES |
dc.type.spa | Artículo | es_ES |